A federal trial is now underway to answer a billion-dollar question: Were a significant number of Amazon’s Prime subscriptions the result of an illusion created by deceptive design? The U.S. government certainly thinks so, and is suing the company for allegedly tricking millions of consumers into its flagship membership program.
The Federal Trade Commission’s case, now before a jury, hinges on the concept of “dark patterns.” The agency alleges that Amazon’s online checkout system was a carefully crafted environment that pushed users toward Prime enrollment, while making it difficult to understand how to avoid it.
The lawsuit also takes aim at the notoriously complex cancellation process, which was allegedly codenamed “Iliad.” The FTC argues that this was a deliberate strategy to retain members by making the process of leaving so arduous that it wasn’t worth the effort. This “retention by frustration” tactic is at the heart of the government’s complaint.
This trial is a major salvo in the Biden administration’s campaign to enforce antitrust and consumer protection laws more aggressively against the tech industry. A verdict against Amazon would not only be a financial blow to the company but could also force a fundamental rethinking of subscription models across the internet.
Amazon denies any wrongdoing, portraying the lawsuit as a misguided effort by an overzealous regulator. The company maintains that its Prime service is a great value and that it has always been transparent about its terms. The trial’s outcome will depend on whether the jury believes Amazon’s designs were informative or deceptive.
13